ArticleScientific reports2026
Mechanical and physical properties investigations of carbon fiber prepreg composites fabricated by the out-of-autoclave method with rapid curing for prosthetic foot applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of carbon fiber prepreg composites offers a superior material solution, the efficiency of the production process using conventional methods is often constrained by very long curing times. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effect of heating rate variations in the Rapid Curing (RC) method on the mechanical and physical properties of carbon fiber prepreg composites for prosthetic foot applications. The fabrication process was carried out using the Out-of-Autoclave (OoA) method with the Vacuum Bag Only (VBO) technique at heating rate variations of 1.5 °C/min, 3 °C/min, and 5 °C/min. The fabricated specimens were evaluated through a series of mechanical tests, including tensile, bending, and impact tests, as well as physical tests consisting of density and porosity measurements. A heating rate of 3 °C/min produced the best composite performance, evidenced by the lowest porosity, highest density, and improved tensile, flexural, and impact strengths compared to specimens prepared at other heating rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.