ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of our new three-dimensional navigation system in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the accuracy of a high-precision navigation system that projects a three-dimensional (3D) kidney model onto surgical images by limiting its application to moments of minimal organ deformation during partial nephrectomy (PN). We analyzed 29 patients who underwent PN at Kyoto University Hospital and Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital in Japan. 3D models of the kidney and tumor were generated using DICOM data, whereas 3D point clouds of the surgical field were obtained using stereo camera recordings. Noise reduction processing was applied to the camera-derived point clouds. Registration between the computed tomography-derived models and camera-derived point clouds was performed using the closest iterative point, and the accuracy was assessed using the root mean squared error. We evaluated the effects of the point-cloud surface area and camera-to-target distance on the registration accuracy. Without noise reduction, the median registration error was 2.33 mm, whereas noise reduction improved the accuracy by 1.83 mm. The accuracy was significantly higher when the camera-to-target distance was shorter, with and without noise reduction. The surface area was inversely correlated with the accuracy without noise reduction, but no significant correlation was observed with noise reduction. Focusing on moments with minimal organ deformation, we demonstrated that high-precision surgical navigation is achievable in PN using actual surgical recordings. This may contribute to improved tumor localization and the preservation of renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.