ArticleScientific reports2026
DCBM-Tri: a dual-channel bilinear mapping triplet model for early recognition of acute kidney injury in imbalanced cohorts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common clinical syndrome with poor prognosis and high mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). Delayed diagnosis limits timely intervention and worsens outcomes, while early recognition is further challenged by the imbalanced distribution of AKI and non-AKI cases. A Dual-Channel Bilinear Mapping Triplet (DCBM-Tri) model was proposed for early AKI recognition, which used contrastive learning to enhance patient representations by capturing latent clinical features and improving discriminability in high-dimensional space. To identify clinically meaningful risk factors, SHAP-based interpretability analysis was further applied. The 12-hour-ahead prediction setting (AKI: non-AKI = 537: 2339) provided an optimal balance between discriminative performance and positive case identification. DCBM-Tri showed statistically significant improvements over conventional baselines, including LSTM- and resampling-based methods. However, no statistically significant improvement in AUPRC was observed over the feature-channel ablation model. Moreover, decision curve analysis demonstrated that DCBM-Tri provided a broader range of net clinical benefit across relevant risk thresholds. SHAP analysis further identified the top five contributing features as C-reactive protein, ionized calcium, bicarbonate, pH, and sodium. Overall, DCBM-Tri effectively addresses class imbalance in early AKI prediction by learning discriminative patient similarities, leading to improved sensitivity for high-risk patients. Its interpretable outputs further provide clinically meaningful signals to support early recognition and potential individualized prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.