ArticleScientific reports2026
Influence of cooling rates on the fracture properties of asphalt concrete subjected to freeze-thaw cycles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low‑temperature cracking is one of the main causes of asphalt pavement damage in cold regions. While many parameters influencing its low-temperature performance are well-studied, the specific effect of the cooling rate during freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs) on the fracture performance of asphalt mixtures remains largely unexplored. In this study, the effect of cooling rate on the fracture toughness (FT), fracture energy (FE), and cracking‑resistance index (CRI) of asphalt concrete is investigated. For this purpose, dry and saturated semi-circular bend (SCB) samples were subjected to seven FTCs at different cooling rates (0.1, 0.2, 0.5 °C/min, and the shock‑freeze state) and temperatures (- 5 °C, - 15 °C, and - 20 °C), after which they were fractured under a fixed mixed‑mode I/II loading conditions. The results of this study show that increasing the cooling rate reduces all three parameters: FE, FT, and CRI. For instance, applying FTCs with a cooling rate of 0.1 °C/min was significantly less damaging, resulting in a 16% and 20% reduction in FT and FE, respectively, compared to 23% and 48% for the shock‑freeze state. Furthermore, increasing the cooling rate reduces both the displacement and the peak load at the time of fracture. This degradation is attributed to insufficient time for viscoelastic stress relaxation at rapid cooling rates, which promotes a brittle response characterized by higher stiffness and a greater tendency toward elastic behavior. Other factors also contribute to the reduction in mechanical performance, such as the increased thermal gradient between the core and surface, rapid freezing of surface water compared to core water, and volumetric expansion of trapped water within the core. These phenomena collectively increase thermal stresses and accelerate the formation of microcracks. Finally, the influence of temperature in FTCs was characterized: decreasing the temperature reduced the displacement at failure, whereas the peak load first increased down to - 15 °C before decreasing at lower temperatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.