ArticleScientific reports2026
Modeling recreational visitation at Bureau of Land Management sites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimates of recreational visitation are essential for public land management. Visitation is typically estimated using devices such as automated counters that require logistics and effort, particularly at remote locations or those with several access points. In this study, we investigate the utility of alternative data sources and statistical models for estimating visitation to public lands in the United States, through an analysis of data from 70 Bureau of Land Management sites. We compile 1328 site-months of visitor count data collected on-site, which are used to train and evaluate three random forest models incorporating combinations of 15 site-level characteristics and three sources of digital mobility data-mobile device locations, geolocated social media, and community science observations. Models including site characteristics perform better than models relying on mobility data alone. Cross-validation using held-out sites reveal varying prediction accuracy, suggesting that model generalizability depends on the inclusion of characteristically similar sites in the training data. These results underscore the limitations of relying solely on mobility data for visitation estimation and highlight the benefits of combining diverse data sources. Our approach provides a scalable, data-driven framework for estimating visitation where traditional monitoring is challenging or infeasible, supporting broader applications in recreation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.