Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310019›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A global dataset of taxa to support calibration of invasion risk screening applications.

Lorenzo Vilizzi

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lorenzo VilizziUniversity of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Lodz, Poland. lorenzo.vilizzi@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In invasion science, risk analysis tools are widely used to support the prevention and management of non-native species introductions. Many decision-support frameworks, including those derived from Weed Risk Assessment methodologies such as the Invasiveness Screening Kit (ISK) family of tools, require calibration of outcome scores to distinguish between higher- and lower-risk species. A prerequisite for such calibration is the a priori categorisation of screened species as invasive or non-invasive based on evidence from their introduced range, when applicable. This paper provides a curated global dataset comprising 1,926 taxa identified from 209 applications of the ISK tools across 266 risk assessment areas worldwide, spanning over 21 years. The taxa were assigned de novo a priori invasion-status categorisations through a standardised verification workflow using authoritative databases and scientific literature. All verification steps and categorisation-evidence sources are recorded in the dataset, ensuring reproducibility of the evidence supporting each final taxon-level categorisation. This dataset provides a standardised reference resource to support calibration and comparative analyses of invasion risk screening applications.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesCalibrationRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID42310019
PMCPMC13635209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.