Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309991›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

PhotIQA: A photoacoustic image data set with image quality ratings.

Anna Breger, Janek Gröhl, Clemens Karner, Thomas R Else, Ian Selby, Tom Rix, Lara-Sophie Witt, Merle Duchêne, Jonathan Weir-McCall, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna BregerUniversity of Cambridge, DAMTP, Cambridge, United Kingdom. ab2864@cam.ac.uk.
Janek GröhlUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Physics, Cambridge, UK.
Clemens KarnerMedical University of Vienna, CMPBE, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas R ElseUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Physics, Cambridge, UK.
Ian SelbyUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Radiology, Cambridge, UK.
Tom RixGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), IMSY, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lara-Sophie WittENI-G, a Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Merle DuchêneENI-G, a Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany.
Jonathan Weir-McCallUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Radiology, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5842-842X
Carola-Bibiane SchönliebUniversity of Cambridge, DAMTP, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) T1307Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image quality assessment (IQA) is crucial in the evaluation stage of novel algorithms operating on images, including traditional and machine learning based methods. Due to the lack of available quality-rated medical images, most commonly used full-reference IQA measures have been developed and tested for natural images. Reported pitfalls and inconsistencies arising when applying such measures for medical images are not surprising, as they rely on different properties than natural images. In photoacoustic imaging (PAI), especially, standard benchmarking approaches for assessing the quality of image reconstructions are lacking. PAI is a multi-physics imaging modality, in which two inverse problems have to be solved, which makes the application of IQA measures uniquely challenging due to both, acoustic and optical, artifacts. To support the development and testing of IQA measures we assembled PhotIQA, a data set consisting of 1134 photoacoustic images. The images were rated by five experts across five quality properties in a full-reference setting, where the detailed rating enables usage beyond PAI. The data set with the images and corresponding ratings is publicly available on Zenodo.

Identifiers

PMID42309991
PMCPMC13635179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.