Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309989›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Speech Neurophysiology in Realistic Contexts: Big Hype or Big Leap?

Giovanni M Di Liberto, Emily Y J Ip

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giovanni M Di LibertoSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7361-0980
Emily Y J IpSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Research Ireland 13/RC/2106_P2Research Ireland 18/CRT/6224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the neural basis of speech communication is essential for uncovering how sounds are translated into meaning, how that changes with development, ageing and speech-related deficits, as well as contributing to brain-computer interfaces research. While traditional neurophysiological studies have relied on simplified, controlled paradigms, recent advances have shifted the field towards more ecologically valid approaches. Here, we describe the evolving landscape of experimental designs in speech neurophysiology, from discrete to continuous stimuli and from socially isolated listening to dynamic, multiagent communication. Realistic paradigms in that space challenge conventional methods, offering richer insights into neural encoding, functional brain mapping and neural entrainment. At the same time, they introduce significant analytical and technical complexities, particularly when incorporating social interaction. By synthesising findings across studies, we highlight how these ecologically valid speech paradigms have been contributing to refining theories of language processing and open new avenues for research. In doing so, this review critically evaluates of whether the move towards realism in speech neurophysiology represents a technological trend or a transformative leap in understanding the neural underpinnings of speech communication.

Indexed as

BrainNeurophysiologySpeechSpeech PerceptionBrain MappingHumansdialogueneurophysiologyperceptionsocial interactionspeech

Identifiers

PMID42309989
PMCPMC13275642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.