ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Speech Neurophysiology in Realistic Contexts: Big Hype or Big Leap?
Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech Neurophysiology in Realistic Contexts: Big Hype or Big Leap?The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Review
- Neural Tracking of Sustained Attention, Attention Switching, and Natural Conversation in Audiovisual Environments Using Wearable EEG.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the neural basis of speech communication is essential for uncovering how sounds are translated into meaning, how that changes with development, ageing and speech-related deficits, as well as contributing to brain-computer interfaces research. While traditional neurophysiological studies have relied on simplified, controlled paradigms, recent advances have shifted the field towards more ecologically valid approaches. Here, we describe the evolving landscape of experimental designs in speech neurophysiology, from discrete to continuous stimuli and from socially isolated listening to dynamic, multiagent communication. Realistic paradigms in that space challenge conventional methods, offering richer insights into neural encoding, functional brain mapping and neural entrainment. At the same time, they introduce significant analytical and technical complexities, particularly when incorporating social interaction. By synthesising findings across studies, we highlight how these ecologically valid speech paradigms have been contributing to refining theories of language processing and open new avenues for research. In doing so, this review critically evaluates of whether the move towards realism in speech neurophysiology represents a technological trend or a transformative leap in understanding the neural underpinnings of speech communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.