Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309772›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2026

Development and improvement of Chinese Haemovigilance Network from 2018 to 2023.

Ling Li, Bo Pan, Bangqiang Zhu, Hui Huang, Xiaoyu Guan, Yaling Zhou, Liu He, Jue Wang, Zhong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ling LiDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Bo PanDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Bangqiang ZhuDepartment of Blood Transfusion, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hui HuangWuhu Blood Center, Wuhu, China.
Xiaoyu GuanDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yaling ZhouDepartment of Laboratory, The Sixth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Liu HeClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, China.
Jue WangClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-7335
Zhong LiuClinical Transfusion Research Center, Institute of Blood Transfusion, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8173-9656

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2021-I2M-1-060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the evolving data trends of the Chinese Haemovigilance Network (CHN) and provide insights into its future development. MATERIALS AND

methodsData were collected from the CHN covering the period of 2018-2023. The data were subdivided into three phases and analysed from several aspects. We also compared the percentage distribution of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) between the CHN and other national haemovigilance reports.

resultsOverall, the number of hospitals participating in reporting ATRs has increased, from a total of 188 in 2018-2019 to 206 in 2020-2021 and 222 in 2022-2023. The CHN received 6410 ATRs cases: 1915 in 2018-2019, 2265 in 2020-2021 and 2230 in 2022-2023. The reports for all three phases covered 11 types of ATRs that involved transfusion of nine blood components. The highest percentage of ATRs was caused by apheresis platelets (591/1915 in 2018-2019, 756/2265 in 2020-2021 and 760/2230 in 2022-2023). In terms of ATR severity, no severity was overwhelming (91.70% in 2018-2019, 95.74% in 2020-2021 and 93.34% in 2022-2023). The CHN report showed a higher proportion of allergic reactions compared to serious hazards of transfusion. Similarly, differences in the distribution of ATRs were also observed between the CHN system and both the Australian and transfusion and transplantation reactions in patients haemovigilance systems.

conclusionOver the past 6 years, the CHN has established a relatively advanced haemovigilance system. Comparison of the CHN and other national haemovigilance reports revealed differences in the classification and percentage distribution of ATRs, underscoring the need for standardized reporting to enhance global transfusion safety.

Indexed as

Blood SafetyTransfusion ReactionBlood TransfusionChinaHumansadverse transfusion reactionblood safetyChinaChinese Haemovigilance Networkhaemovigilance

Identifiers

PMID42309772
PMCPMC13563488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.