Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309771›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

De-extinction: how reviving the past is revolutionizing the future of conservation biology.

Jennifer C Hutchison, Katherine L Moon, Shahrzad Abri, Jonathon Walsh, Cori N Booker, Stefano Daza Arango, Sara Ord, Andrew J Pask

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer C HutchisonColossal Australia, School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Katherine L MoonColossal Australia, School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Shahrzad AbriColossal Biosciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jonathon WalshColossal Biosciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Cori N BookerColossal Biosciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Stefano Daza ArangoColossal Biosciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sara OrdColossal Biosciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andrew J PaskColossal Australia, School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activity is driving a biodiversity crisis marked not only by accelerating species extinctions but also by rapid erosion of genetic and phylogenetic diversity. De-extinction science has emerged in response. Here, we synthesize de-extinction as a conservation workflow that integrates ancient and museum genomics, comparative genome analysis, high-precision genome engineering, stem cell platforms, advanced assisted reproductive technologies (ART), emerging ex-utero gestation systems, and AI-enabled ecological modelling and monitoring. We frame three primary conservation applications: (i) reconstruction of lost ecological functions via engineered de-extinct species, (ii) genetic rescue and de-endangerment through restoration of lost diversity, repair of deleterious alleles, and enhancement of adaptive potential in living species, and (iii) acceleration of enabling technologies, particularly ART and stem cell capabilities, that remove reproductive bottlenecks in threatened taxa. Recent advances in sequencing and assembly now support high-quality genomes from extinct and archival material (e.g., thylacine, mammoth, dodo), enabling identification of functionally relevant variation, much of which resides in regulatory landscapes rather than coding sequence alone. In parallel, next-generation editing systems (base, prime, twinPE and large-fragment integration approaches) are shifting the field from single-variant correction to systematic rewriting of loci and regulatory modules, supported by long-read validation and stringent cell-line quality control. We discuss complementary cellular routes (somatic cells and pluripotent stem cells), the promise of in vitro gametogenesis and synthetic embryo models, and the potential of artificial gestation to overcome surrogate scarcity and interspecies incompatibility. Finally, we highlight rewilding as the decisive endpoint, requiring adaptive management, Indigenous partnership, and high-fidelity AI-assisted monitoring. Taken together, de-extinction is best understood as a technology engine for conservation, one that expands the actionable toolkit for preventing extinctions, restoring resilience, and rebuilding lost biodiversity.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesExtinction, BiologicalAnimalsBiodiversityEndangered SpeciesGenomicsHumansReproductive Techniques, AssistedAssisted reproductionConservationDe-extinctionGenome editing

Identifiers

PMID42309771
PMCPMC13291586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.