ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026
De-extinction: how reviving the past is revolutionizing the future of conservation biology.
Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human activity is driving a biodiversity crisis marked not only by accelerating species extinctions but also by rapid erosion of genetic and phylogenetic diversity. De-extinction science has emerged in response. Here, we synthesize de-extinction as a conservation workflow that integrates ancient and museum genomics, comparative genome analysis, high-precision genome engineering, stem cell platforms, advanced assisted reproductive technologies (ART), emerging ex-utero gestation systems, and AI-enabled ecological modelling and monitoring. We frame three primary conservation applications: (i) reconstruction of lost ecological functions via engineered de-extinct species, (ii) genetic rescue and de-endangerment through restoration of lost diversity, repair of deleterious alleles, and enhancement of adaptive potential in living species, and (iii) acceleration of enabling technologies, particularly ART and stem cell capabilities, that remove reproductive bottlenecks in threatened taxa. Recent advances in sequencing and assembly now support high-quality genomes from extinct and archival material (e.g., thylacine, mammoth, dodo), enabling identification of functionally relevant variation, much of which resides in regulatory landscapes rather than coding sequence alone. In parallel, next-generation editing systems (base, prime, twinPE and large-fragment integration approaches) are shifting the field from single-variant correction to systematic rewriting of loci and regulatory modules, supported by long-read validation and stringent cell-line quality control. We discuss complementary cellular routes (somatic cells and pluripotent stem cells), the promise of in vitro gametogenesis and synthetic embryo models, and the potential of artificial gestation to overcome surrogate scarcity and interspecies incompatibility. Finally, we highlight rewilding as the decisive endpoint, requiring adaptive management, Indigenous partnership, and high-fidelity AI-assisted monitoring. Taken together, de-extinction is best understood as a technology engine for conservation, one that expands the actionable toolkit for preventing extinctions, restoring resilience, and rebuilding lost biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.