ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026
Bisphenols and follicle function in farm species.
Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bisphenols are synthetic chemicals widely used in the production of plastics, resins, and food-contact materials, resulting in ubiquitous environmental exposure in humans and animals. Among their biological effects, increasing evidence highlights their ability to disrupt ovarian function. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the impact of bisphenols and their analogues on ovarian follicle physiology in domestic species, drawing primarily from bovine, ovine, and porcine studies, with comparisons to human and rodent data. After outlining bisphenol structures, exposure routes, and metabolic pathways in farm animals, we summarize their mechanisms of action on follicular cells, including receptor-mediated signaling, transcriptional regulation, epigenetic modifications, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Experimental data consistently indicate that bisphenols alter key ovarian processes such as folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, granulosa cell viability, oocyte maturation, and embryo development. However, the magnitude and direction of these effects vary depending on the compound, dose, exposure duration, and experimental model. A major emerging factor influencing bisphenol sensitivity is the metabolic status of the exposed animal. Evidence suggests that nutritional or metabolic imbalances modulate ovarian responses to bisphenols, potentially through interactions between metabolic and endocrine pathways involving estrogen receptors (ERs), thyroid hormone receptor (TR), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Future research should integrate reproductive and metabolic endpoints to better elucidate the mechanisms underlying bisphenol-induced ovarian dysfunction under physiologically relevant conditions. Such approaches are essential for assessing the reproductive risks of chronic, low-dose exposure to bisphenols in livestock and for supporting sustainable animal production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.