Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309765›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

Advances in pig embryo production for cryopreservation, transfer and genome editing.

Cristina Cuello, Manuela Garcia-Canovas, Marcos Torregrosa-Fuentes, Adelina Lopez-Jara, Inmaculada Parrilla, M Antonia Gil, Emilio A Martinez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cristina CuelloDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Manuela Garcia-CanovasDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Marcos Torregrosa-FuentesDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Adelina Lopez-JaraDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Inmaculada ParrillaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
M Antonia GilDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Emilio A MartinezDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research "Campus Mare Nostrum" University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pig embryo production has emerged as a cornerstone for advancing both agricultural efficiency and biomedical innovation. In vivo-derived embryos remain the gold standard for cryopreservation and embryo transfer due to their superior developmental competence; however, the need for surgical recovery continues to limit their applicability on a large scale. Recent advances in nonsurgical transfer techniques and refined donor-management protocols are bringing widespread implementation closer to feasibility. Concurrently, in vitro production (IVP) systems provide a scalable alternative by generating embryos from oocytes obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries or through ovum pick-up. Despite this potential, IVP efficiency remains hindered by polyspermy and suboptimal conditions for oocyte maturation and embryo culture. Ongoing research is mainly directed toward improving culture environments through supplementation with growth factors and cytokines to more closely emulate the conditions found in the reproductive tract, while enhanced in vitro fertilization strategies have proven effective in reducing polyspermy. Efforts to mitigate oxidative stress and lower lipid content have improved the cryotolerance of IVP-embryos, further narrowing the gap with their in vivo counterparts. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current methodologies, recent progress, and future perspectives for obtaining in vivo and in vitro embryos suitable for cryopreservation, transfer, and genome editing in pigs.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo TransferGene EditingAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFertilization in VitroSwineEmbryoEmbryo technologiesIn vitroembryo productionIn vivoembryo productionPig

Identifiers

PMID42309765
PMCPMC13286658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.