ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026
Advances in pig embryo production for cryopreservation, transfer and genome editing.
Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pig embryo production has emerged as a cornerstone for advancing both agricultural efficiency and biomedical innovation. In vivo-derived embryos remain the gold standard for cryopreservation and embryo transfer due to their superior developmental competence; however, the need for surgical recovery continues to limit their applicability on a large scale. Recent advances in nonsurgical transfer techniques and refined donor-management protocols are bringing widespread implementation closer to feasibility. Concurrently, in vitro production (IVP) systems provide a scalable alternative by generating embryos from oocytes obtained from slaughterhouse ovaries or through ovum pick-up. Despite this potential, IVP efficiency remains hindered by polyspermy and suboptimal conditions for oocyte maturation and embryo culture. Ongoing research is mainly directed toward improving culture environments through supplementation with growth factors and cytokines to more closely emulate the conditions found in the reproductive tract, while enhanced in vitro fertilization strategies have proven effective in reducing polyspermy. Efforts to mitigate oxidative stress and lower lipid content have improved the cryotolerance of IVP-embryos, further narrowing the gap with their in vivo counterparts. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current methodologies, recent progress, and future perspectives for obtaining in vivo and in vitro embryos suitable for cryopreservation, transfer, and genome editing in pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.