Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309763›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

Perspectives in porcine semen conservation (liquid and frozen).

Marc Yeste

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc YesteBiotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction (TechnoSperm), Institute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, ES-17003 Girona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pigs, breeding primarily relies on Artificial Insemination (AI) with preserved semen. Maintaining sperm under proper conditions is thus vital for optimal reproductive performance. Currently, pig sperm can be preserved either in a liquid state at 15-20°C or 4-5°C, or cryopreserved, with most AI being conducted with liquid-stored semen at 15-20°C. This article reviews the state of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in preserving pig semen, focusing on the most recent advances. It describes the differences between conventional (15-20°C) and hypothermic (4-5°C) storage, and discusses the relevance of reducing the presence of antibiotics in semen extenders. The work also approaches sperm cryopreservation, including the effects of freezing and thawing on sperm function and survival, and on reproductive performance, and provides a general overview of the need to identify ejaculates with good cryotolerance. The effects of semen transport and the potential improvement from additives to preservation media are also discussed. The main take-home message is that AI with preserved sperm yields good reproductive performance, and that the perspectives for progress in the coming years should focus on reducing antibiotics and implementing methods that allow selecting ejaculates that withstand better liquid storage and/or cryopreservation.

Indexed as

CryopreservationSemen PreservationAnimalsCryoprotective AgentsFreezingInsemination, ArtificialMaleSemenSpermatozoaSwineCryoprotective AgentsCryopreservationHypothermic storageLiquid storage at 15–20°CSemen

Identifiers

PMID42309763
PMCPMC13286731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.