Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309759›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

Trophoblast differentiation in the bovine placenta.

Abdallah Abdelhady, Andrew M Kelleher, Thomas E Spencer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdallah AbdelhadyDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Andrew M KelleherDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Thomas E SpencerDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle have a synepitheliochorial type of placenta characterized as semi-invasive with distinctive placentomes that develop from interdigitation and growth of placental cotyledons and endometrial caruncles that are crucial for fetal growth and development. As the elongated bovine conceptus begins implantation, trophoblast giant cells (TGC), also referred to as binucleate trophoblast cells, begin to differentiate from progenitor uninucleate cells (UNC). Based primarily on histological studies, the TGC developmental program is theorized to involve endoreplication of progenitor UNC to produce polyploid TGC. TGC are highly specialized cells with unique gene regulatory networks that enable production of pregnancy-specific proteins, such as chorionic somatomammotropin hormone 2 (CSH2; also known as placental lactogen), pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs), and prolactin-related proteins (PRPs). Secreted factors from the TGC impact uterine gland development and secretory function, fetal growth and development, and maternal adaptations to pregnancy. Importantly, TGC are part of the foundation of cotyledons required for placentome formation. Single cell atlases of the developing and mature bovine placenta and derivation of trophoblast stem cells (TSC) and their differentiation into UNC and TGC are new developments in the field. This review will discuss how those advances impact our fundamental knowledge of trophoblast differentiation and placenta development in cattle.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationPlacentaPlacentationTrophoblastsAnimalsCattleFemalePregnancyPregnancy ProteinsPregnancy ProteinsBovineDevelopmentPlacentaSingle cellTrophoblast

Identifiers

PMID42309759
PMCPMC13286684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.