Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309742›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

Sexed semen: current state-of-the-art in small ruminants.

Clara González-Marín, Fanie Steyn, Johan Gerhard Nel, Pablo Juan Ross

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clara González-MarínSTGenetics, Navasota, TX 77868, USA.
Fanie SteynRamsem, Renosterspruit, South Africa.
Johan Gerhard NelReproherd Veterinary Services, Pretoria, South Africa.
Pablo Juan RossSTGenetics, Navasota, TX 77868, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising global demand for animal products, driven by population growth and limited agricultural land, necessitates more sustainable and efficient livestock production systems. Flow cytometric sperm sex-sorting remains the only reliable technology available to control offspring sex ratios, thereby enhancing productivity in food-producing mammals. While the technology was originally developed and widely adopted in cattle, its application in small ruminants, particularly sheep and goats, remains comparatively limited and is largely confined to research and early-stage commercial use. This review examines the use of sperm sex-sorting in small ruminants, summarizing outcomes from experimental and field trials. Special attention is given to biological and technical constraints affecting performance, including sperm sensitivity to sorting and cryopreservation, fertility of sexed versus conventional semen, and logistical and economic considerations for implementation. Understanding these factors is essential for advancing the commercial adoption of sexed semen and optimizing reproductive efficiency in small ruminant production systems.

Indexed as

RuminantsSemenSex PreselectionSpermatozoaAnimalsCattleCryopreservationFlow CytometryGoatsMaleSemen PreservationSheepFertilityFlow cytometrySexed semenSex-sortingSmall ruminants

Identifiers

PMID42309742
PMCPMC13286671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.