Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309731›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

Biobanking biodiversity: recent strategies, challenges, and opportunities.

Pei-Chih Lee, Pierre Comizzoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pei-Chih LeeSmithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, D.C. 20008, USA.
Pierre ComizzoliSmithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, D.C. 20008, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earth is undergoing accelerated loss of biodiversity. As wild animal populations decline, the resulting erosion of genetic diversity threatens species' adaptive potential and long-term survival. Wildlife biobanking, defined as the systematic collection, preservation, and use of biological materials and their associated metadata, has emerged as a critical conservation strategy. Importantly, building on decades of progress in cryobiology and reproductive biotechnologies, gonadal and somatic tissues and cells from thousands of wild species have been preserved worldwide. These biobanks serve as genetic insurance policies, supporting animal care and management, research, assisted reproduction, and eventual population recovery. This review discusses current strategies, challenges, and future opportunities in wildlife biobanking. Cryopreservation approaches for different sample types and taxa also are reviewed, emphasizing the challenges of sample availability and species-specific cryotolerance. The objective is also to integrate increasingly large amount of data associated with biological samples (digital biobanking) into conservation efforts. New frontiers in biobanking include innovative ambient-temperature preservation, precision biobanking informed by omics technologies, data interpretation using artificial intelligence, and establishment of global networks. These promising developments provide more opportunities to enhance and expand wildlife biobanking more quickly and broadly.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBiodiversityBiological Specimen BanksConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsCryopreservationHumansBiobankingBiodiversityCryopreservationDigital biobanking

Identifiers

PMID42309731
PMCPMC13286723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.