Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309727›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2026

Foundational reproduction programs for U.S. dairy herds.

Paul M Fricke, Megan R Lauber, Milo C Wiltbank, Natalia Hincapie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul M FrickeDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Megan R LauberDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Milo C WiltbankDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Natalia HincapieDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before the early 2000's, poor reproductive performance in U.S. dairy herds prevented commercial dairy farms from adopting assisted reproductive technologies. A reproduction revolution occurred in the U.S. dairy industry over the past 25 years during which the long-term decrease in reproductive performance dramatically reversed and began to increase. Although many factors are associated with increased reproductive performance (i.e., genetics, nutrition, management), the adoption of fertility programs by dairy farmers has driven much of this increase. Today, most U.S. dairy farms combine fertility programs with automated activity monitoring systems to inseminate cows, which has further increased AI service rates. A novel conceptual idea accompanying the dramatic increase in reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows is what has been coined "The High Fertility Cycle" which relates changes in BCS during the periparturient period with profound effects on pregnancy outcomes, pregnancy loss, and health events after submission of cows to fertility programs for first TAI. Taken together, these two factors have led to the historically high reproductive performance in U.S. dairy herds today. As a result, commercial dairy farms increased use of sexed dairy semen and beef semen and embryo transfer programs into their breeding programs. Rapidly shifting U.S. market prices for replacement dairy heifers and beef cattle will continue to affect how farmers allocate semen types within their herds moving forward. A major problem limiting the adoption of embryo transfer programs by commercial dairy farms is the associated high rates of pregnancy loss after establishment of pregnancy using embryo transfer compared with artificial insemination. Future research is needed to identify the underlying mechanisms of and strategies to mitigate pregnancy loss after embryo transfer before embryo transfer programs are widely adopted.

Indexed as

BreedingDairyingReproductionReproductive Techniques, AssistedAnimalsCattleEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilityInsemination, ArtificialPregnancyUnited StatesEmbryoFertilitySemenSexedTransfer

Identifiers

PMID42309727
PMCPMC13286717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.