ArticleBMJ open2026
ElecTrical Impedance TomogRaphy vs dynamic compliANce guided positive end-expiratory pressure Titration during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery (TITRANT): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07170514 (Electrical Impedance Tomography vs Dynamic Compliance Guided Positive End-expiratory Pressure Titration During Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Electrical Impedance Tomography vs Dynamic Compliance Guided Positive End-expiratory Pressure Titration During Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery: A Multi-center, Prospective Randomized Trial - TITRANT
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInappropriate mechanical ventilation plays a pivotal role in the development of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and subsequent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), thus individualised lung protective ventilation became a hot topic of research during the past decades. Despite promising results from early trials focusing on separated ventilatory parameters, the incidence of PPCs has not decreased significantly, hence a new conceptual direction emerged in the last few years by evaluating the potential role of mechanical power of ventilation (MP), since MP encompasses all mechanical ventilation parameters that can be responsible for lung injury and recent research confirmed correlation between high MP values and the severity of VILI. Reducing MP by optimising positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is rational, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) appears to be a promising tool in achieving this goal, as it has the potential to distinguish alveolar recruitment from overdistension, thus providing a more accurate picture of the lungs thereby being superior to other approaches. Therefore, it is worth testing this hypothesis in a clinical trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentric, single-blinded, interventional, superiority, randomised controlled trial will include 200 patients aged 18 years and older undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries. The trial will be conducted in three Hungarian centres (two non-university teaching hospitals and one university medical centre). Participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. Patients in the PEEP-EIT group will receive an EIT-guided PEEP titration, while in the PEEP-dynamic pulmonary compliance (Cdyn) group a dynamic pulmonary compliance-guided PEEP titration will be performed in order to determine the optimal level of PEEP. We aim to evaluate the superiority of using EIT-guided PEEP titration versus the Cdyn-guided approach by comparing their effects on MP, as the primary endpoint, measured immediately after the titration procedure and at the end of surgery. Secondary endpoints are oxygenation, respiratory mechanics parameters, global inhomogeneity index, overdistension/collapse and PPCs. Participants will be followed up until the 28th postoperative day for mortality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Hungarian Scientific and Medical Research Council Ethics Committee (Registration number: NNGYK/21074-6/2025) on 17 June 2025. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants (or their legally authorised representatives) prior to enrolment in the study. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07170514.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.