ArticleBMJ open2026
Patients' perceptions of physical activity and cardiac rehabilitation after spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD): a focus group study in Sweden.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome mainly affecting younger to middle-aged women. Physical activity has been discussed as a potential trigger for SCAD. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of physical activity among patients and their experiences of cardiac rehabilitation following the event.
designQualitative descriptive study using digital focus groups and inductive qualitative content analysis.
settingSix digitally conducted focus groups (Zoom) in Sweden.
participantsTwenty-six women and three men (median age 57 years) who had experienced SCAD within the past 3 months to 3 years were recruited via a national SCAD peer-support group and eight university hospitals.
resultsParticipants continually re-negotiated their bodily capacity after SCAD, marked by fear, uncertainty and a loss of bodily trust. Difficulty interpreting bodily signals and fear of physical strain often led to avoidance of physical activity. Recovery was experienced as slow and unpredictable, reinforced by inconsistent or insufficient advice from healthcare professionals. Limited follow-up and lack of SCAD-specific rehabilitation contributed to feelings of isolation and abandonment. Despite these challenges, participants gradually developed personal strategies to rebuild strength and confidence. Peer interaction and shared experiences contributed to emotional safety, motivation and hope during rehabilitation.
conclusionPost-SCAD rehabilitation should address both physical and emotional recovery through coherent, person-centred follow-up with individualised guidance and opportunities for peer support to reduce uncertainty and support long-term recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.