ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2026
Recovery and analysis of ancient DNA: challenges, methods, and applications in forensic and archaeological science.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ancient DNA (aDNA) research has revolutionised archaeology and forensic science by enabling genomic recovery from highly degraded remains. This review explores the biochemical and environmental factors influencing aDNA preservation, alongside methodological advances that have improved data yield and authenticity. Techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), single-stranded library preparation, and hybridisation capture have transformed the field, allowing recovery from ultrashort fragments and challenging contexts such as warm climates. Authentication strategies-including cytosine deamination profiling, fragment length analysis, and rigorous contamination controls-remain essential to ensure reliability. Applications of aDNA extend beyond ancestry reconstruction and population genetics to include forensic identification, kinship analysis, and pathogen detection. Lessons from forensic genetics, such as stringent validation and contamination mitigation, have informed best practices in archaeological contexts. However, ethical considerations are central to both domains. Issues of Indigenous data sovereignty, consent, repatriation, and culturally sensitive interpretation demand transparent, community-led research frameworks. These principles align with international agreements such as the Nagoya Protocol and emerging guidelines for equitable benefit-sharing. Despite significant progress, challenges persist, including geographic sampling bias, interpretive uncertainty, and the need for interdisciplinary integration. Future directions emphasise long-read sequencing, metagenomic approaches, and artificial intelligence-driven analytics, alongside robust ethical governance. By combining technological innovation with culturally responsible practices, aDNA research continues to advance our understanding of human history while reinforcing the importance of ethical stewardship in forensic and archaeological science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.