ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2026
Successful treatment of the first reported case of Prototheca wickerhamii infection in a dog living in Tasmania, Australia.
Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine protothecosis is an uncommon opportunistic infection, most frequently reported in warm, humid climates. In dogs, it typically presents as disseminated disease following primary colonic involvement and carries a poor prognosis for clinical cure. No standardised treatment protocol exists in veterinary medicine. Regimens that maintain an acceptable quality of life often incorporate posaconazole, while amphotericin B may be used with curative intent in selected cases. We report the first documented case of localised cutaneous protothecosis due to Prototheca wickerhamii in a dog from Tasmania, Australia, together with its successful management. A 2-year-old neutered male Chihuahua cross presented with painful swelling and ulceration of the metacarpal and metatarsal pads, resulting in marked lameness. Diagnosis was established by cytology, histopathology, culture and MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry on samples from affected pads. Three sequential treatment protocols were trialled: (i) modified pulsed itraconazole therapy, (ii) oral posaconazole and (iii) intralesional amphotericin B deoxycholate. Itraconazole was ineffective. Posaconazole led to the resolution of clinical signs, although ongoing therapy was required, and relapse occurred after cessation of therapy. Subsequent treatment with intralesional amphotericin B achieved sustained clinical remission, consistent with sustained clinical remission and possible cure. This case expands the recognised geographic and clinical spectrum of canine protothecosis, documenting infection in a temperate region and in a localised cutaneous form. It highlights the importance of considering protothecosis in atypical dermatological presentations and supports the use of posaconazole for disease control and amphotericin B, specifically intralesional administration, for definitive therapy in clinical veterinary practice settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.