ReviewBMJ global health2026
Analysis of bilateral development assistance for surgery in low- and middle-income countries: trends, challenges and opportunities.
Review in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains underfunded despite representing a significant portion of the Global Burden of Disease. Understanding bilateral development assistance for surgery is crucial to address this disparity.
methodsWe conducted a narrative review and quantitative analysis of bilateral development assistance for surgery in LMICs from 2014 to 2022 using data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Creditor Reporting System. Surgical projects were identified through keyword search. We report funding trends, key actors, project classifications, implementation channels and regional distribution, and examine trends through thematic analysis of key characteristics of bilateral aid.
resultsBetween 2014 and 2022, US$2.73 billion was disbursed to surgical projects. Surgical funding decreased as a proportion of total bilateral development assistance for health (DAH), from 2.13% in 2014 to 1.32% in 2022. Key donors were Canada, the USA, Australia, Italy and Korea. Obstetrics and gynaecology received the most funding among surgical subspecialties. Non-governmental organisations were the primary implementation channels (51.4%), which could undermine public sector development by bypassing national health systems, perpetuating fragmentation and limiting governments' capacity to sustain surgical services independently. Sub-Saharan Africa was the principal recipient region, securing 55.17% of disbursements.
conclusionsDespite increasing commitments, surgical care remains underfunded, with an overall 1.84% share of bilateral DAH. Contributing factors include limited expressed public sector demand and absorption capacity in recipient countries, donor disbursement practices tied to performance indicators and shifting donor priorities. Recipient countries can enhance funding utilisation and donor attraction by strengthening national surgical plans, improving health system capacity, engaging stakeholders collaboratively, advocating for balanced funding across specialties and exploring innovative financing mechanisms. Addressing these challenges is essential to optimising surgical care funding and improving health outcomes in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.