Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42309510›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Barriers and facilitators to detoxification from opioid substitution treatment: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Amy Bagshaw, Suleyman Shah, India Olchefske, Louise M Paterson, Mike J Crawford, Anne Lingford-Hughes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy BagshawDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6485-3286
Suleyman ShahDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
India OlchefskeDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Louise M PatersonDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mike J CrawfordDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anne Lingford-HughesDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-3453

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/P000703/1Medical Research Council MR/T025557/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDespite the well-documented benefits of opioid substitution treatment (OST) in treating opioid dependence (OD), many people diagnosed with OD desire to live a drug-free life. The transition to abstinence involves detoxification: a gradual dose reduction of OST to zero milligrams. Despite these aspirations, only a minority of patients undertake detoxification, and successful completion remains limited. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to detoxification from OST, to help provide a better understanding of what can be done to support patients and improve outcomes in OD.

methodsFour databases were searched until 22 January 2025: PubMed, Embase, APA PsycINFO and CINAHL. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies of individuals with a diagnosis of OD undergoing detoxification from OST, or staff responsible for providing the treatment, were included. Studies of only pharmacological interventions were excluded. An integrated approach to data synthesis was used, transforming quantitative data into textual descriptions to integrate them with qualitative data and form one set of themes. Joanna Briggs Institute checklists were used to assess the quality of included papers.

resultsFrom 1999 studies identified, 41 papers were deemed eligible. Studies originated from the USA (22), UK (7), Sweden (6), Canada (1), Ireland (1), Norway (1), Switzerland (1), Australia (1) and China (1). The medications explored included methadone (28), buprenorphine (5), both forms (6) and unspecified OST (2). Studies were conducted in outpatient settings (29), inpatient settings (7), mixed settings (4) and a prison setting (1). Participants included patients (37), treatment providers (1) and mixed populations (3). Factors affecting detoxification were present at an individual and structural level, with overlap between influences at the initiation and completion phases. Eight themes emerged, comprising psychological and emotional factors (particularly around fear of detoxification), personal motivation, withdrawal symptoms, clinical and demographic factors, environmental factors, social factors, professional support and treatment models/interventions. 54% of included studies were rated high quality, and 37% of medium quality.

conclusionDetoxification from opioid substitution treatment appears to be commonly hindered by fear, emotional resurgence, low confidence, environmental turbulence, negative social influences and insufficient professional/pharmacological support, while facilitators include psychological readiness, life stability, supportive relationships, psychological interventions, inpatient facilities and adjunctive medications.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersBuprenorphineHumansMethadoneBuprenorphineMethadoneaddictionbarriersdetoxificationdose taperingfacilitatorsmethadoneopioid substitution treatmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42309510
PMCPMC13578861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.