ArticleThe Science of the total environment2026
Childhood residential proximity to the radiologically contaminated Coldwater Creek and later-life cardiovascular disease in the St. Louis Baby Tooth study.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the 1940s, Coldwater Creek-located in St. Louis, Missouri's northern suburbs-has been contaminated by radioactive waste produced by the Manhattan Project's effort to refine uranium for the first atomic bomb. Here, we used the St. Louis Baby Tooth-Later Life Health Study (SLBT) to evaluate whether residential proximity to Coldwater Creek during childhood was associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. Among 4209 eligible SLBT participants, we fit Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs between our CVD outcomes (any CVD, atherosclerotic CVD, and hypertension) and proximity of childhood residential addresses to Coldwater Creek (≤1 km, >1-5 km, >5-20 km, and > 20 km), adjusting for sociodemographics. Among participants ≤1 km from Coldwater Creek (~3% of our study population), the HR was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.85) for any CVD and 1.81 (95% CI: 1.00, 3.25) for atherosclerotic CVD compared to those living >20 km from the creek. Despite more imprecision in the estimate, there was suggestive evidence of an association with hypertension (HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.64). Our study suggests that living near Coldwater Creek as a child is associated with a higher risk of developing CVD, where our data suggests that associations were strongest with atherosclerotic subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.