ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
The impact of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome on subsequent preschool wheezing in very preterm infants: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis multicenter cohort study investigated the association between neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) and wheezing in preschool-aged preterm infants.
methodsA total of 525 children born at < 32-weeks' gestation were enrolled from three tertiary hospitals in Southwest China and classified into RDS (n = 275) and non-RDS (n = 250) groups. Current wheezing (≥ 1 parental-reported episode in the past year) outcomes were assessed using the International Study on Asthma and Allergy in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire at 3-6 years of age.
resultsThe RDS group showed a significantly higher incidence of current wheezing (11.3% vs. 5.6%; aOR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.20-4.98). Subgroup analyses revealed particularly elevated risks among females, infants born at 28⁺⁰-29⁺⁶ weeks, those with birth weights of 1000-1499g, non-IVF conceptions, those with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and those with < 14-days of oxygen therapy. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings.
conclusionsThe study indicates that RDS is an independent risk factor for wheezing in preterm preschoolers and highlights the need for targeted respiratory monitoring in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.