ArticleFamily medicine2026
Evaluating the Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum in a Family Medicine Residency: Challenges and Successes From a 10-Year Experience.
Article in Family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a vital skill for family physicians, yet no standardized curriculum exists for its implementation in residency programs. This study used a survey of program graduates to evaluate a decade-long experience integrating POCUS into a family medicine residency.
methodsWe surveyed resident program graduates to assess the usefulness of POCUS training elements, frequency of use, and barriers to POCUS adoption in clinical practice.
resultsSurvey results indicated that portable ultrasound access, workshops, and small-group sessions were the most valued training methods. Despite high participation in hands-on training, most graduates reported using POCUS infrequently in practice, citing barriers such as insufficient training, lack of access to devices, and time constraints. Notably, POCUS was most commonly used in musculoskeletal, obstetric, and soft tissue applications.
conclusionsThe implementation of a structured POCUS curriculum in family medicine residency is feasible and beneficial, particularly when supported by institutional resources and faculty engagement. However, persistent barriers to routine use in clinical practice highlight the need for ongoing support, access to equipment, and mentorship postgraduation to enhance POCUS adoption among family physicians.
Identifiers
42308616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.