Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2026
Treatment completion rate, toxicity, and 90-Day unplanned readmission in older adults with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving radiotherapy alone versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal treatment for older adults (≥70 years) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial, with limited evidence comparing radiotherapy (RT) alone versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).
methodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective, target trial emulation study of 432 patients aged ≥70 years with ESCC who received definitive RT (n = 214) or CCRT (n = 218) between 2016 and 2024. The primary outcome was treatment completion rate, defined as receipt of prescribed radiation dose for RT, and additionally achieving a relative dose intensity ≥80% for chemotherapy in the CCRT group. Key secondary outcomes included grade ≥3 toxicity and 90-day unplanned readmission. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for confounding.
resultsAfter adjustment, CCRT was associated with significantly lower treatment completion rates compared to RT (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.86, 95% CI, 0.79-0.93; absolute risk difference -13.5%). CCRT demonstrated higher rates of grade ≥3 toxicity (38.1% vs 17.8%; aRR 2.01), grade 4 toxicity (8.7% vs 2.3%; aRR 3.55), and 90-day readmission (21.6% vs 12.6%; aRR 1.72). RT completion alone was also lower with CCRT (80.3% vs 88.3%; RR 0.91). Short-term tumor response was numerically higher with CCRT, at the cost of significantly increased toxicity. Effects were more pronounced in patients aged ≥75 years, those with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥6, and frail patients (G8 ≤ 14).
conclusionsIn this real-world cohort of older adults with ESCC, CCRT was associated with significantly lower treatment completion rates and higher toxicity and readmission rates compared to RT alone. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection and shared decision-making when considering treatment intensification in older adults with ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42308557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.