ArticleHealth education research2026
Supporting responsive feeding in early childhood education centres: a process evaluation of the CELEBRATE feeding intervention using the RE-AIM framework.
Article in Health education research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early childhood education centres are key settings for fostering self-regulation skills related to food through responsive feeding environments. The CELEBRATE Feeding coaching intervention aimed to support early childhood educators in implementing these practices across eight centres in two Canadian provinces. Using the RE-AIM framework, quantitative and qualitative data from coaching logs, pre- and post-intervention surveys, observations, interviews, and a 6-month post-intervention survey were analysed as part of the process evaluation. The intervention reached a diverse range of educators and children, resulting in improvements in responsive feeding behaviours, with observation scores significantly increasing (38.2-45.8 on a 63-point scale, P < .001) from baseline to post-intervention. Interviewed centre staff (n = 37) reported engaging more frequently in responsive feeding practices and observed positive changes in children's food intake and independence. Most surveyed educators (>90%) found the 6-month duration and monthly visits appropriate, with strong support from their coach. Educators valued expert guidance and practical resources and felt motivated and capable in adopting responsive feeding practices. Challenges included communication, scheduling barriers, and educator turnover. Follow-up data indicated that all centres continued key practices, though some barriers remained. Overall, the intervention had a positive impact, though addressing logistical barriers is crucial for long-term sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.