Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308460›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2026

Organic Chemistry as a Catalyst for AI Innovation: Challenges, Methods, and Emerging Paradigms.

Nitesh V Chawla, Gisela A González-Montiel, Kehan Guo, Taicheng Guo, Ting Hua, Xiaobao Huang, Eric Inae, Meng Jiang, Khiem Le, Gang Liu and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Nitesh V ChawlaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3932-5956
Gisela A González-MontielDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, 236 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0665-5326
Kehan GuoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Taicheng GuoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Ting HuaLucy Family Institute for Data and Society, University of Notre Dame, 384 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Xiaobao HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Eric InaeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Meng JiangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Khiem LeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Gang LiuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
J Charlie MaierDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 250 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Nuno MonizLucy Family Institute for Data and Society, University of Notre Dame, 384 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Brenda NogueiraDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Deng PanLucy Family Institute for Data and Society, University of Notre Dame, 384 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Bryan V PiguaveDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 250 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Brett M SavoieDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 250 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7039-4039
Andrew B SchofieldDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 250 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Yili ShenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Alexander TaylorDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, 236 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Xiangliang ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Yihan ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Fitzpatrick Hall of Engineering, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.
Olaf WiestDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, 236 Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-7720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and organic chemistry are redefining each other in a fundamentally bidirectional relationship. This Review highlights how the intrinsic challenges of organic chemistry have acted as a catalyst for conceptual and methodological innovation in AI itself. Sparse and heterogeneous reaction data sets spurred the development of self-supervised and few-shot learning paradigms; the combinatorial complexity of multireactant chemistry motivated the transition from graph neural networks to hypergraph architectures; the need to bridge symbolic chemical reasoning with statistical prediction inspired chemical language models grounded in large language model frameworks; and the iterative, decision-intensive nature of synthesis planning catalyzed the rise of autonomous agentic systems. We survey the multimodal landscape of chemical data, tracing the evolution of molecular representations from classical fingerprints to geometric encodings and examining how each representation class shapes downstream model capabilities. We analyze how data scarcity and uneven property distributions have driven advances in transfer learning, self-supervised pretraining, and meta-learning frameworks tailored to molecules and reactions. Reaction prediction, mechanistic inference, and retrosynthesis planning are examined as core areas where chemistry has shaped modern AI techniques. We further explore chemical reasoning through multimodal fusion, generative molecular design, and self-driving laboratories. We conclude by identifying persistent challenges, including data sparsity, selection bias, benchmark-to-lab gaps, and reproducibility.

Identifiers

PMID42308460
PMCPMC13352509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.