Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308411›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound measurements for the assessment of perineal body size in a cohort of Swedish nulligravidae.

Emilia Rotstein, Nina Rose, Marianne Starck, Hedvig Engberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilia RotsteinDepartment of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2529-9390
Nina RoseDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marianne StarckDepartment of Surgery, Pelvic Floor Centre, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Hedvig EngbergDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7178-1172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the perineal body's important functional role, few studies have specifically evaluated its size in women. Existing three-dimensional ultrasound studies typically involve small samples, often including both nulliparous and parous women, and focus on measuring internal and external sphincter thickness rather than the perineal body itself. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study primarily aimed to measure the size of the perineal body in a population of nulligravidae (n = 148) using three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography. Secondary aims were to (1) evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of 3D ultrasound interpretation across raters with varying levels of experience and (2) investigate how perineal body measurements correlated with body composition.

resultsThe study participants had a mean age of 31 years (SD ± 6), a mean height of 167 cm (SD ± 5.9), and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.3 kg/m

conclusionsStandardized 3D endoanal ultrasonography provides reproducible measurements of the perineal body in nulligravid women and measurements correlated moderately with body composition. This suggests the use of this imaging method in asymptomatic populations and future research on pelvic floor function.

Indexed as

EndosonographyImaging, Three-DimensionalPerineumAdultBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsSwedenUltrasonographyendoanalnulliparitypelvic floor anatomyperineal bodyperineumultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42308411
PMCPMC13308972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.