ArticleThe ISME journal2026
Widespread marine and freshwater distributions of active sulfoquinovose-degrading bacteria.
Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulfoquinovose (SQ), a sulfonated sugar produced on a gigaton scale each year, contributes to global sulfur cycling, yet the microbes and pathways mediating its turnover in the environment have been inferred largely from genomic potential rather than direct activity. Here, we coupled incubations of environmental samples with 13C-labeled SQ to DNA-stable isotope probing to identify active SQ carbon assimilators across estuary, mangrove, and lake ecosystems. In estuarine communities, Vibrio and Cognatishimia incorporated SQ-derived 13C; Novosphingobium dominated in the mangrove, and Agrobacterium in the lake. Pure-culture experiments, coupled with comparative proteomics and gene knockout validation, demonstrated that Vibrio strains degrade SQ via modified sulfoglycolytic Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas and Entner-Doudoroff pathways to produce the environmentally significant organosulfur 2,3-dihydroxypropanesulfonate. Comparative genomic analyses suggested that closely related genome representatives of Novosphingobium, Cognatishimia, and Agrobacterium encode the sulfolytic SQ monooxygenase pathway. A global survey of aquatic microbial genomes indicated that over 9% harbor SQ degradation clusters, supporting a widespread distribution of bacterial SQ catabolic potential in aquatic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.