Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308291›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Global impacts of drifting fish aggregating devices on marine protected areas.

Laurenne Schiller, Juan Carlos Villaseñor-Derbez, John Lynham, Boris Worm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurenne SchillerBiology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0329-9792
Juan Carlos Villaseñor-DerbezDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Rosenstiel School for Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Science and Frost Institute for Data Science and Computing, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1245-589X
John LynhamDepartment of Economics and UHERO, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-9648
Boris WormBiology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-8716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protected areas are a critical component of efforts to reverse biodiversity loss by 2050. In the ocean, free-drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs) are released in large numbers by industrial purse seine fishing companies to help catch tuna. These devices can enter marine protected areas (MPAs) undetected, potentially leading to wildlife entanglement, plastic pollution, and habitat degradation. Here we investigate processes by which dFADs may compromise MPA objectives and assess the burden they put on existing MPAs. By analyzing drift, strandings, and expert interview data, we show that dFADs have likely interacted with 53% of the global MPA network by area and stranded in 174 protected areas, which are home to at least 490 at-risk species. While recent improvements to dFAD design should reduce harm to wildlife, our findings suggest that improved regulation, transparency, and industry accountability are required to mitigate additional effects on MPAs, especially around documented hotspots in the central Pacific, western Indian Ocean, and Caribbean.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFisheriesFishesAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID42308291
PMCPMC13274597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.