Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308258›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Behavioral determinants of continued use of Islamic FinTech: The moderating role of service and system quality.

Ayman Abdalmajeed Alsmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ayman Abdalmajeed AlsmadiAl Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-8424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of continued use of Islamic FinTech services through an examination of how useful Islamic FinTech services appear, what others think about the user's use of Islamic FinTech services, how confident the user feels when using these services, and how much the user trusts the service provider in relation to the user's actual use. This study will examine the relationship between the user's actual use and their behavioral intention to continue to use the service. Additionally, this study will examine the role that both the service quality and system quality play as moderators for post adoption behaviors. In order to complete this study, a cross sectional survey was used to gather data from 232 active users of Islamic FinTech services in Jordan. A series of previously validated likert scale items were used to measure the variables used in this study. PLS-SEM with SmartPLS 4 software was utilized to test both direct and moderator effects in the proposed research model. Bootstrapping techniques were applied in order to determine if the structural paths in the model were significantly different from zero at a 95% confidence level. The results indicated that the proposed model accounted for 63.4% of the variance in actual use (R² = .634). The findings show that all four constructs; perceived usefulness, subjective norms, self-efficacy and perceived trust, are positively related to the user's actual use of Islamic FinTech services. Also, there is a positive association between actual use and behavioral intentions to continue use of Islamic FinTech services. System quality has a moderating effect on the relationship between actual use and continuance intention while service quality does not have a statistically significant moderating effect. This study is one of few studies examining post adoption behavior in the context of Islamic FinTech services within Jordan. The study combines multiple theoretical frameworks including cognitive theory, social influence theory, and trust theory and incorporates both service quality and system quality into a singular framework to examine continuance behavior of Islamic FinTech usage.

Indexed as

IslamCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionJordanMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42308258
PMCPMC13274856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.