ArticlePloS one2026
Unveiling the psychological network of work alienation among nursing interns: A resource conservation perspective and network analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical internship is critical for nursing students, but heavy workload and emotional demands increase the risk of work alienation. Traditional linear models fail to capture complex interrelationships among psychological factors.
objectiveTo apply psychological network analysis to explore the associative structure of work alienation in nursing interns, identifying central and bridge nodes to generate hypothesis‑generating intervention priorities.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was employed. Nursing interns from four tertiary hospitals in the Guanzhong region of Shaanxi Province were recruited via convenience sampling from January to August 2025. Data were collected using the Nurse Work Alienation Scale, Compassion Fatigue Scale, Moral Distress Scale, Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire for Nursing Students, and NASA Task Load Index. A total of 934 valid responses were obtained. A regularized partial correlation network model was estimated using the EBICglasso method (γ = 0.5). Node strength and bridge strength were calculated, and stability was assessed via bootstrap.
resultsNode strength analysis identified personal responsibility (1.19), burnout (1.18), and failure to maintain patient's best interest (1.13) as the three most central nodes. Bridge strength analysis revealed secondary traumatic stress (STS) as the strongest bridge (0.43, 95% CI [0.31, 0.55]), followed by perceived workload (0.38) and self‑evaluation (0.38). Subgroup network comparisons showed no significant structural differences by gender, age, or education (all p > 0.05). Stability analysis confirmed good robustness for centrality estimates.
conclusionPsychological network analysis mapped the associative structure of work alienation, identifying personal responsibility, burnout, and STS as key hub and bridge nodes. These findings offer hypothesis‑generating targets for future interventions (e.g., trauma‑informed care, workload management, self‑efficacy enhancement), pending validation in longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.