ArticlePLOS mental health2026
"I feel like there's going to have to be catastrophe before I am seen:..and that is going to be devastating": Visibility, recognition, and medical silencing in eating disorders and disordered eating.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eating disorders (EDs) and disordered eating behaviours (DEBs) are major global health concerns that remain under-recognized and under-treated. In addition to structural barriers, individuals encounter symbolic and epistemic obstacles, including failures of recognition, diagnostic exclusion, and medical silencing. These processes shape who is legitimized as having EDs/DEBs within biomedical systems and society. To examine how such gaps are produced and navigated, we employ a narrative intersectional methodology. Although analysis was grounded in inductive coding, interpretations were informed by lived-experience alongside narrative and intersectional commitments. We present the overarching theme Who Gets Seen: Recognition and Visibility in EDs/DEBs. Three subthemes emerged: Struggles for Legitimacy, Being Seen, Misread, or Overlooked, and Navigating Self-Recognition. Across themes, participants described barriers to care, recognition, and healing, illustrating how individuals negotiate norms of being seen by family, friends, healthcare providers, and themselves. Findings highlight persistent inequities in recognition and visibility that leave many individuals unnoticed and undertreated. These dynamics reflect epistemic injustice, where credibility and lived realities are undermined within medical systems. Advancing epistemic justice requires reimagining what EDs/DEBs look like and who is considered deserving of recognition and care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.