Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Paula Navarro-NavarroTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-5497
Carlos M Fernández-GiménezTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6871-454X
Andrés C García-MonteroTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.
Iván Álvarez-TwoseCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1190-4473
Alba Pérez-PonsTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-1391
María González-TablasTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9774-1558
Cristina TeodosioTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.
María González-GonzálezTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8115-1086
Sergio MatarrazTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-8005
Antonio LópezCytometry Service (NUCLEUS-USAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Paloma BarcenaTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.
Enrique ColadoServicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8675-8207
Jordi EsteveJosep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute, Campus Clínic-University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8056-648X
Mª Leonor SenentCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain.
Óscar González-LópezTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-4294
María Jara-AcevedoDepartment of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7965-7512
Alberto OrfaoTranslational and Clinical Research in Cancer Program, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad de Salamanca and Fundación para la Investigación del Cáncer de la Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-7230
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
abstractIn 5% to 15% of patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM), SM coexists with an associated hematological neoplasm (AHN). Most patients with SM-AHN harbor a KIT mutation, mainly KIT p.D816V, together with other AHN-related genetic alterations; however, limited data exist about the frequency and clinical impact of the coexistence of both types of genetic alterations in the same vs distinct bone marrow (BM) cell compartments. Here, we analyzed 79 patients with SM-AHN classified into patients who (1) displayed distinct unrelated genetic alterations in BM mast cells (MC) and AHN cells (21/79 [27%]); (2) shared the KIT mutation as a first genetic event (24/79 [30%]) involving both BM MC and AHN cells, together with or without AHN-associated alterations restricted to the latter cells; (3) had AHN-associated alterations as a first event (25/79 [32%]) present in both BM MC and AHN cells; and (4) had both alterations involving virtually all SM and AHN cells (9/79 [11%]). Overall, patients with genetically unrelated SM and AHN more frequently showed clinical manifestations associated with SM (ie, anaphylaxis, osteoporosis, and skin lesions) together with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), whereas those with shared genetic alterations displayed signs of more advanced disease (ie, cytopenias or organomegalies) and shorter PFS and overall survival. Our findings confirm the clinical, genetic, and prognostic heterogeneity of SM-AHN and point to its association with the underlying oncogenic profile of neoplastic MC and AHN cells.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
KIT mutation and AHN-associated oncogenic profiles in systemic mastocytosis with an associated hematological neoplasm. · full record | OpenQuestion