Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308234›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2026

Psychometric properties of hierarchical psychiatric symptoms on the general population.

Takafumi Soda, Shingo Murata, Asako Toyama, Shinsuke Suzuki, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Kentaro Katahira, Yuichi Yamashita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takafumi SodaDepartment of Information Medicine, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo MurataDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Minato, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0790-1915
Asako ToyamaGraduate School of Social Data Science, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-7316
Shinsuke SuzukiCentre for Brain, Mind and Markets, Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9816-9423
Yoshihiko KunisatoGraduate School of the Humanities, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-7182
Kentaro KatahiraHuman Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-3938
Yuichi YamashitaDepartment of Information Medicine, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2779-8222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although psychiatric disorders have conventionally been treated categorically, recent research indicates a continuous and hierarchical structure among psychiatric symptoms, with a general psychopathology factor (p-factor) at the top and several specific factors at lower levels. However, the understanding of the psychometric properties of these factors in the general population remains limited. In this study, by analyzing responses from approximately 1000 non-Western individuals across three datasets to various diagnostic questionnaires, we extracted general and specific factors using diverse hierarchical structures and factor numbers. Comparative analysis revealed distinct properties of the general and specific factors, regardless of model assumptions. Specifically, the general factor explained a greater proportion of shared variance in the data and exhibited higher internal consistency than the specific factors. Consistent with the concept of the p-factor, the general factor was associated with a history of diagnoses across various diagnostic categories. Conversely, the content of the specific factors varied depending on the factor numbers, and some corresponded to traditional diagnostic categories, indicating that specific factors may be advantageous for describing individual differences. Our findings, we believe, provide a scaffold for disentangling the complex structure among psychiatric symptoms.

Identifiers

PMID42308234
PMCPMC13274908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.