ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Psychometric properties of hierarchical psychiatric symptoms on the general population.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Language or syndrome? Investigating the origins of the general psychopathology factor through large language model embeddings.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although psychiatric disorders have conventionally been treated categorically, recent research indicates a continuous and hierarchical structure among psychiatric symptoms, with a general psychopathology factor (p-factor) at the top and several specific factors at lower levels. However, the understanding of the psychometric properties of these factors in the general population remains limited. In this study, by analyzing responses from approximately 1000 non-Western individuals across three datasets to various diagnostic questionnaires, we extracted general and specific factors using diverse hierarchical structures and factor numbers. Comparative analysis revealed distinct properties of the general and specific factors, regardless of model assumptions. Specifically, the general factor explained a greater proportion of shared variance in the data and exhibited higher internal consistency than the specific factors. Consistent with the concept of the p-factor, the general factor was associated with a history of diagnoses across various diagnostic categories. Conversely, the content of the specific factors varied depending on the factor numbers, and some corresponded to traditional diagnostic categories, indicating that specific factors may be advantageous for describing individual differences. Our findings, we believe, provide a scaffold for disentangling the complex structure among psychiatric symptoms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.