ArticlePloS one2026
Construction and validation of an instrument to assess the university dropout intention formation process UDIFP-29.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant body of research supports the importance of addressing university students' dropout intention, the process through which university students form the intention to dropout from their studies. However, available measurement tools failed to account for how dropout intention is formed over time. This research aimed to fill that gap by developing and validating a multidimensional self-report instrument to assess how the intention to dropout from the university is formed. Three studies were designed for this purpose. Study 1 used focus groups to explore how the intention to dropout emerges in freshman students enrolled at a university, with the purpose of developing a theoretical model to explain how the intention to dropout emerges. Study 2 focused on the content validation of the preliminary version of the instrument, which was carried out by expert judgment. Study 3 examined the construct validity of the instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and analyzing its convergent and divergent validity. The results showed a model with good adjustment and adequate internal consistency indexes. In general, the instrument has adequate psychometric properties, proving to be reliable and valid for measuring the process of forming early university dropout intention. Use of this instrument will allow the design of timely strategies and interventions to reduce dissatisfaction, dropout ideation and dropout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.