Trial reportPloS one2026
Implementing a patient-oriented pole walking intervention in retirement homes: A non-randomized feasibility trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05388227 (Pole Walking Intervention Within Independent Living/Retirement Communities), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pole Walking Intervention Within Independent Living/Retirement Communities: Feasibility and Pilot
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing a patient-oriented pole walking (PW) intervention in retirement home settings and preliminary changes in outcome measures related to physical function and other fall- and fracture-related risk factors to inform a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).
methodsThis single-arm, non-randomized feasibility trial implemented a patient-oriented PW intervention across four retirement homes in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. During Summer 2022, we assessed 24 residents for eligibility, of which 19 consented and 17 received the intervention. The intervention was offered as supervised group sessions (20-60 minutes) three times per week for 12 weeks. Each session consisted of posture and balance warm-up, PW, muscle strengthening, and stretching. The primary outcome measure was feasibility as assessed by consent, recruitment, retention, and adherence rates as well as by intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility scores. The secondary outcome measures included safety (evaluated by recorded adverse events) and preliminary 12-week changes in physical function and other fall- and fracture-related risk factors (examined with paired-samples t-tests or repeated measures analysis of covariance models).
resultsFifteen participants (mean age 85.2 years; 93% female) completed the study. The consent, recruitment, retention, and mean adherence rates were 79%, 2.7 participants/site/month, 88%, and 90%, respectively. The mean participant- and instructor-reported scores for intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were all > 4.0 (out of 5). There were no recorded intervention-related serious adverse events. Participants improved their functional balance/mobility (timed "up & go" test: -1.6 seconds; 95% CI: -2.7 to -0.4), lower-body strength (30-second chair stand test: 2.4 repetitions; 1.2 to 3.5), 36-item short-form survey physical functioning score (12.9; 3.7 to 22.2), and forearm muscle area (67.7 mm2; 12.9 to 122.6) over 12 weeks.
conclusionsIt was feasible and safe to implement our patient-oriented PW intervention in retirement homes. Findings will inform our future RCT in these settings.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05388227.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.