ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Computer-aided detection for radiological disease severity classification on chest radiograph in children with intra-thoracic tuberculosis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implementation of the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended shorter 4-month treatment regimen for non-severe tuberculosis (TB) in children requires classification of disease severity on chest X-ray (CXR). Access to specialists for CXR interpretation is limited. We explored the use of computer-aided detection of CXR ("CAD") to automate CXR classification of radiological disease severity. To do this, we combined three CXR datasets from children with confirmed and clinically diagnosed TB across the disease spectrum. CXRs were independently classified as radiologically severe or non-severe by two expert human readers. Definition of radiological disease severity aligned with WHO guidelines. CAD scores were generated by CAD4TB v7.0 and qXR v3.0 software. Neither software product was specifically trained with paediatric CXRs or for disease severity classification. We compared CAD scores between CXRs classified by human readers as non-severe versus CXRs classified by human readers as severe. CXRs from 526 children were included in this analysis: median age was 2.1 years (inter-quartile range 1-4.2 years); 57% of the children had microbiologically confirmed TB. We found that median CAD scores were significantly lower for CXRs classified as non-severe versus severe by human readers; the difference was greatest in children >5 years. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.82 and 0.78 for qXR, and 0.79 and 0.76 for CAD4TB, against the reference of 'severe' as classified by each individual human reader respectively. These results demonstrate that CAD is a promising tool for TB disease severity stratification and has the potential to support access to shorter TB treatment regimens for children. Investment in paediatric CAD training and development to optimize solutions for children beyond the TB screening and diagnosis use-case is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.