ArticlePloS one2026
Comparative mediation analysis of dog and cat ownership and perceived stress.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Companion animals, such as dogs and cats, are widely reported to be associated with lower stress, yet species-specific differences remain unclear. We conducted a comparative mediation analysis to examine how pet ownership type (dog vs. cat) relates to perceived stress, leveraging a large, balanced dataset (1,923 dog owners and 1,804 cat owners) collected throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Investigated mediators included human-animal interaction, emotional closeness, perceived costs, behavior problems, and disease transmission concerns. We used a directed acyclic graph (DAG)-guided, bootstrap-based path modeling approach to estimate mediation-based associations. Dog and cat ownership differed only marginally in their overall association with perceived stress, with dog ownership associated with slightly lower stress levels. Comparative mediation analyses revealed the largest species-specific difference in human-animal interaction. This mediator showed a strong inverse association with perceived stress for dog ownership but only a minimal association for cat ownership. Accordingly, human-animal interaction emerged as the most influential mediator for dog ownership, whereas emotional closeness was most influential for cat ownership. Moreover, emotional closeness showed a positive association with perceived stress in both groups. Perceived costs and behavior problems showed the strongest associations with higher perceived stress across species, slightly more pronounced for dog ownership. Yet their mediation-based associations were weak, largely attributable to minimal differences in perceived costs and behavior problems between dog and cat ownership. Only 26% of the overall association between ownership type and perceived stress was accounted for by the study mediators, indicating the need to explore additional mediators. This study advances understanding of how the human-animal bond is associated with perceived stress and underscores species-specific differences in these associations. These findings can help generate hypotheses for future longitudinal studies and may help inform the development of species-tailored interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.