Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308189›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Automated classification of natural habitats using ground-level imagery.

Mahdis Tourian, Remy Vandaele, Sareh Rowlands, Max Fancourt, Rebecca Mein, Bethany Hadfield, Alison Saunders, Sophie Potter, Amy Woodget, Hywel T P Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mahdis TourianCentre for Environmental Intelligence, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-2606-692X
Remy VandaeleCentre for Environmental Intelligence, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Sareh RowlandsCentre for Environmental Intelligence, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6783-3064
Max FancourtNatural England, York, United Kingdom.
Rebecca MeinNatural England, York, United Kingdom.
Bethany HadfieldNatural England, York, United Kingdom.
Alison SaundersNatural England, York, United Kingdom.
Sophie PotterNatural England, York, United Kingdom.
Amy WoodgetNatural England, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6956-1664
Hywel T P WilliamsCentre for Environmental Intelligence, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of terrestrial habitats is critical for biodiversity conservation, ecological monitoring, and land use planning. Several habitat classification schemes are in use, typically based on analysis of satellite imagery and validation by field ecologists. Here, a methodology is presented for classification of habitats based solely on ground-level imagery (photographs), offering improved validation and enhanced ability to classify habitats at scale (e.g., using imagery from citizen science). In collaboration with Natural England, a public sector organisation with responsibility for nature/biodiversity conservation in England, this study develops a classification system that applies deep learning to ground-level habitat photographs, categorising each image into one of 16 distinct classes following the established 'Living England' framework. Images were pre-processed using resizing, normalisation, and augmentation techniques, while resampling was used to balance classes in the training data and enhance model robustness. A custom deep learning classifier based on the DeepLabV3-ResNet101 architecture was developed and fine-tuned to assign a habitat class label to ground-level photographs. Using five-fold cross-validation, the model demonstrated strong overall performance across 16 habitat classes, with accuracy and F1-scores varying between classes. This approach supports robust, scalable habitat classification based on balanced and well-prepared training data. Across all folds, the model achieved a mean F1-score of 0.63, with some habitat classes such as Bare Sand (BS) and Coniferous Woodland (CW) reaching values above 0.87. High performance was achieved for visually distinct habitats and lower performance for visually mixed or ambiguous classes. These findings demonstrate the potential of this approach for ecological monitoring. Ground-level imagery is easily obtained and accurate computational methods for habitat classification based on such data have many potential applications. To support use by practitioners, a simple web application is also provided that allows classification of uploaded images using the trained model.

Indexed as

EcosystemImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSatellite ImageryBiodiversityClassification AlgorithmsConservation of Natural ResourcesConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningEnglandPhotography

Identifiers

PMID42308189
PMCPMC13274866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.