ArticlePloS one2026
Automated classification of natural habitats using ground-level imagery.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate classification of terrestrial habitats is critical for biodiversity conservation, ecological monitoring, and land use planning. Several habitat classification schemes are in use, typically based on analysis of satellite imagery and validation by field ecologists. Here, a methodology is presented for classification of habitats based solely on ground-level imagery (photographs), offering improved validation and enhanced ability to classify habitats at scale (e.g., using imagery from citizen science). In collaboration with Natural England, a public sector organisation with responsibility for nature/biodiversity conservation in England, this study develops a classification system that applies deep learning to ground-level habitat photographs, categorising each image into one of 16 distinct classes following the established 'Living England' framework. Images were pre-processed using resizing, normalisation, and augmentation techniques, while resampling was used to balance classes in the training data and enhance model robustness. A custom deep learning classifier based on the DeepLabV3-ResNet101 architecture was developed and fine-tuned to assign a habitat class label to ground-level photographs. Using five-fold cross-validation, the model demonstrated strong overall performance across 16 habitat classes, with accuracy and F1-scores varying between classes. This approach supports robust, scalable habitat classification based on balanced and well-prepared training data. Across all folds, the model achieved a mean F1-score of 0.63, with some habitat classes such as Bare Sand (BS) and Coniferous Woodland (CW) reaching values above 0.87. High performance was achieved for visually distinct habitats and lower performance for visually mixed or ambiguous classes. These findings demonstrate the potential of this approach for ecological monitoring. Ground-level imagery is easily obtained and accurate computational methods for habitat classification based on such data have many potential applications. To support use by practitioners, a simple web application is also provided that allows classification of uploaded images using the trained model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.