ArticlePloS one2026
Diet quality determinants among manufacturing workers in Brazil: Socio-demographic factors, food choices, and ultra-processed foods.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the association between diet quality and socio-demographic factors, anthropometric measures, food choices, and consumption of processed foods in a low-income Brazilian manufacturing worker population, addressing gaps in evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 921 workers from 33 industries in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil, selected via stratified proportional and multi-stage sampling. Diet quality was assessed using the Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I), which evaluates variety, adequacy, moderation, and balance. Dietary intake was measured via 24-hour recalls, and foods were classified by processing level (NOVA system). Socio-demographic, anthropometric, and food choice data (using the Food Choice Questionnaire) were collected. Associations were analyzed using multilevel linear regression. Higher diet quality was associated with being male (p = 0.001). Among women, diet quality improved with age (p = 0.018) and participation in a food assistance program (p < 0.001), whereas those variables showed no association among men. Prioritizing natural food content predicted higher DQI-I scores in both sexes (p < 0.05), while weight control was significant only for women (p = 0.034). Unprocessed food intake showed a positive association (p < 0.001) with diet quality, whereas ultra-processed food consumption was inversely associated (p < 0.001), most notably with diet variety and adequacy in both sexes, and with moderation in women. Food choices also influence diet quality, with people who value health benefits, natural content, weight control, and familiar products being more likely to consume diets with better variety and adequacy. No significant associations were found between diet quality and anthropometric measures. Socio-demographic factors, food choices, and levels of food processing significantly influence diet quality in this low-income Brazilian population. Public health strategies targeting reductions in ultra-processed food consumption and supporting food assistance programs may improve dietary patterns, particularly among women. These findings highlight the need for context-specific interventions to address nutrition transitions in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.