Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42308085›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2026

Role and relevance of genetic testing in patients with kidney stones: a review from EAU Section of Endourology.

Carsten A Wagner, John A Sayer, Michael Straub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carsten A WagnerInstitute of Physiology and Zurich Kidney Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
John A SayerESEUT European Association of Urology Endourology Section.
Michael StraubESEUT European Association of Urology Endourology Section.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewKidney stones have a high heritability. More than 40 genes have been identified causing monogenic forms of kidney stone disease (KSD). Kidney stone formers with genetic variants implicated in monogenic forms of KSD often suffer from early onset, high recurrence rates, and chronic kidney disease. Some patients may also exhibit extrarenal disease requiring attention. RECENT

findingsRecent analysis of KSD patients identified a likely monogenic cause in pediatric populations in 17-30% of participants while in adult unselected populations 2.7-8% had a positive finding. More patients carry single genetic variants in monogenic forms that are classically considered as autosomal recessive but may cause an intermediate genetic risk for the development of KSD possibly in interaction with environmental or lifestyle factors. Genome-wide association studies have identified additional risk loci associating with KSD. Their clinical relevance are currently investigated. Patients with recurrent kidney stone episodes may be at elevated risk of progressive chronic kidney disease. SUMMARY: Monogenic causes of KSD are prevalent in patients less than 25 years of age and in some patients with high-risk metabolic profiles. These patients should undergo genetic testing to enable a precise molecular genetic diagnosis and personalized therapy as well as family counseling and screening.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingKidney CalculiGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPhenotypeRecurrenceRisk Factorschronic kidney diseasecystinuriagenome-wide association studieshigh riskkidney stone diseasemonogenic diseaserecurrent kidney stonesSLC34 transporters

Identifiers

PMID42308085
PMCPMC13566409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.