ArticleeLife2026
Quantifying intracellular mechanosensitive response upon spatially defined mechano-chemical triggering.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanotransduction process relies on the interaction of mechanical and biochemical cues, transmitting cellular forces to intracellular organelles to activate biochemical pathways and elicit responses. This involves mechanoresponsive components like actin filaments, microtubules (MTs), and the lamin meshwork. Fluidic force microscopy (FluidFM), a force-controlled micropipette, allows for the manipulation of intact cells mechanically and chemically, providing a novel approach to study mechanotransmission in cells in situ. FluidFM combined with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) enables high-resolution mapping of intracellular tension dynamics. Here, we used cells with varying nuclear lamina compositions to explore the lamina's role in initiating mechanoresponse to external cues. We found that A- and B-type lamins trigger nuclear mechanoresponse distinctly, with A-type lamins contributing to nuclear elasticity, whereas B-type lamins influence viscous response. Moreover, MTs underwent mechanical adaptation and assisted in releasing the tension in lamin A/C knockout (KO) cells, contrasting with healthy cells where MTs aid in preserving the tension locally rather than transferring it. This research provides insights into the dynamic mechanoresponse of cellular components and supports targeted therapies for mechanical stress-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.