Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307904›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2026

Adherence to Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Guidelines among Canadian college students: a regression analysis.

Julia Pei, Laura B Jones, Chris G Richardson, Richard J Munthali, Kristen L Hudec, Angel Y Wang, Lonna Munro, Daniel V Vigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia PeiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Laura B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Chris G RichardsonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Richard J MunthaliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kristen L HudecDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Angel Y WangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lonna MunroDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Daniel V VigoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study is to evaluate adherence to seven Canadian Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Guideline (LRCUG) recommendations among Canadian university students and identify subgroups of high-risk users.

methodsWe analyzed survey data collected across four Canadian universities under the World Mental Health-International College Student (WMH-ICS) initiative. Seven of the ten 2017 LRCUG recommendations were evaluated. Zero-inflated Poisson models were employed to examine the sociodemographic correlates of (1) any lifetime cannabis use; and (2) the number of unmet LRCUG recommendations, conditional on lifetime use. Additionally, multivariable binary logistic regression models examined the sociodemographic correlates of adherence to individual recommendations.

resultsAmong the 27 236 respondents, the prevalence of lifetime cannabis use was 33.8%. Of the seven recommendations evaluated, "choosing lower-strength cannabis products" had the lowest adherence rate (29.0%), followed by "not smoking cannabis" (36.7%). "Not using synthetic cannabis" had the highest adherence rate (96.1%), followed by "delaying cannabis use until age 16" (91.2%). Men, non-heterosexual students, students living in shared housing, and domestic students were more likely to use cannabis and, among users, reported risky use. While White students were more likely to use cannabis, among users, many non-White student groups reported riskier use.

conclusionAlthough most students did not use cannabis and many of the LRCUG recommendations had high rates of adherence, there were low rates of choosing lower-strength cannabis products and avoiding smoking cannabis among users. Study findings highlight specific recommendations and subpopulations to inform tailoring of future interventions targeting university students.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceMarijuana SmokingMarijuana UseStudentsAdolescentAdultCanadaFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMalePrevalenceRegression AnalysisUniversitiesYoung Adultadolescentscannabisstudents, adolescentssubstance-related disorders

Identifiers

PMID42307904
PMCPMC13597005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.