ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026
Comparative Phytochemical Analysis of Five South African Bulbine Species Using Chromatography-Based Methods.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bulbine Wolf (Asphodelaceae) comprises over 80 species, with five holding significant medicinal value in South Africa for treating skin and gastrointestinal ailments. While roots are traditionally prioritised, the chemical profiles of leaves and rhizomes remain underexplored although they are also medicinally important. This study used chromatographic and mass spectrometry-based analytical techniques (HPTLC, LC-QToF-MS, and UPLC-MS) combined with chemometric analysis to chemically profile the metabolites of five Bulbine species from the Eastern Cape. Chemical profiling tentatively identified 73 compounds, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, and anthraquinones. Phenylanthraquinones, specifically knipholone and knipholone 6'-methyl ether, were ubiquitous across all taxa. Species-specific markers were identified, such as bulbine-knipholone in B. abyssinica, gaboroquinones in B. frutescens, and bulbnatalonosides in B. latifolia. Chemometric modelling revealed that while rhizome chemistry is relatively conserved, root profiles provide the most robust inter-species differentiation. Bulbine frutescens and B. latifolia displayed the highest chemical diversity, whereas B. asphodeloides was notably rich in anthocyanins. The significant overlap in bioactive constituents between leaves, roots and rhizomes suggests that aerial parts could serve as viable substitutes in traditional remedies. These findings establish a chemical basis for species authentication and support sustainable harvesting practices by reducing the destructive exploitation of rhizomes and roots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.