ArticleSpine deformity2026
Does social deprivation influence timely presentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed presentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is common in the UK and is characterised by larger Cobb angles at diagnosis. The size of the Cobb angle influences the mode and effectiveness of treatment strategies and worsens the overall outcome and prognosis. Severe scoliosis typically necessitates surgical correction. We hypothesised that social deprivation may be one factor that contributes to delayed presentation.
aimsTo assess whether social deprivation is associated with greater spinal curvature at first consultation.
methodsA retrospective study of children presenting with AIS to a major UK children's hospital between 2013 and 2022. Cobb angle and the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2019 rank were initially analysed as continuous variables using scatter plot visualisation and linear regression. Subsequently, a case-control analysis was performed with revised groupings: cases were defined as patients with large, neglected curves (Cobb angle > 70°) and controls as patients with nonoperative scoliosis (Cobb angle < 50°). Patients with Cobb angles between 50° and 70° (n = 31) were excluded from the case-control analysis to reduce misclassification. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, linear regression, and logistic regression.
resultsA total of 364 patients were identified. Linear regression of IMD rank against Cobb angle across the full cohort demonstrated a non-significant regression coefficient (β = 19.90, p = 0.335), with a Pearson correlation of r = 0.051. After excluding 31 patients with Cobb angles 50-70°, the case-control analysis included 113 cases and 220 controls. Logistic regression yielded an odds ratio for IMD decile of 0.992 (95% CI 0.923-1.066, p = 0.828), confirming no significant association between social deprivation and curve severity.
conclusionThis study did not find a significant association between social deprivation and severity of scoliosis at presentation. Findings were consistent across both continuous and categorical analyses. However, the lack of variability in the studied population and potential overmatching may have limited the ability to detect meaningful differences. Large-scale, multicentre studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.