Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42307878›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Estimating multivariate longitudinal trajectories using mixed-effects models with crossed random effects.

José Ángel Martínez-Huertas, Emilio Ferrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

José Ángel Martínez-HuertasDepartment of Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, National Distance Education University (UNED), Madrid, Spain. jamartinez@psi.uned.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6700-6832
Emilio FerrerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7520-046X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we examine how a mixed-effects model with crossed random effects for individuals and variables estimates within- and between-variability in longitudinal multivariate trajectories from cohort-sequential designs. These designs are characterized by large proportions of planned missing data, and they usually require continuous-time metrics. Via simulations, we evaluated different model outcomes under various conditions regarding the size of clusters (individuals and variables) and the complexity of the trajectories. Results show that (a) this model can estimate the general trajectories (common to all individuals and variables) and their variability, plus the variable-specific trajectories through the predictions of the levels of the random factors; (b) the standard errors of the random effects are wide, yet they are important for making substantive decisions for specific variables; and (c) the model predictions can adequately forecast individual and variable-specific complete trajectories from just a few observations per individual. These results are supported in an empirical illustration using cognitive developmental data. These findings show that researchers can obtain complete individual trajectories for multiple variables throughout a target age range. The relative simplicity of this model in comparison with other alternatives makes it a promising and accessible tool for multivariate longitudinal data analysis.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal StudiesMultivariate AnalysisContinuous-time metricCrossed random effectsForecastingMixed-effects modelsMultivariate longitudinal dataTrajectoriesVariables

Identifiers

PMID42307878
PMCPMC13275786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.