ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Improving bystander CPR and AED training among college students: strategies and barriers.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of mortality, with survival highly dependent on timely bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use. Despite well-established benefits, rates of bystander intervention and training remain suboptimal, particularly within college populations. This review examines current gaps in CPR/AED training, identifies key barriers to implementation, and evaluates emerging strategies to enhance basic life support (BLS) readiness in college settings. Available evidence demonstrates that limited training access, lack of confidence, poor AED awareness, and socioeconomic disparities contribute to low bystander response rates. Although legislative mandates and traditional training programs have improved exposure, variability in training quality and retention persists. Emerging approaches, including hybrid training models, virtual and augmented reality platforms, and mobile technologies such as AED mapping and responder alert systems, offer scalable solutions to improve skill acquisition, retention, and real-time response. Building on these findings, we propose a structured implementation framework for universities centered on policy integration, scalable training delivery, technology-enabled response systems, reinforcement strategies, and outcome-driven evaluation. College campuses represent a uniquely accessible and high-impact environment for large-scale deployment of these interventions. The electrophysiology community is well positioned to lead and support these efforts through collaboration with academic institutions, professional societies, and industry partners. A coordinated, systems-level approach that integrates education, technology, and policy has the potential to significantly improve bystander response and outcomes in OHCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42307877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.